860
-2.826
Covariance
.075
-.017
N
Courses
Pearson Correlation
-.040
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.603
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
-2.826
Covariance
-.017
2.282
N
There is no statistically significant correlation between participant gender and the number of courses they took towards increasing their computer proficiency and/or knowledge.
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Courses
1.73
1.511
Experience
3.87
1.463
Correlations
Courses
Experience
Courses
Pearson Correlation
1
.047
Sig. (2-tailed)
.541
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
17.715
Covariance
2.282
.104
N
Experience
Pearson Correlation
.047
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.541
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
17.715
Covariance
.104
2.140
N
There is no statistically significant correlation between the number of courses a participant took and their self-assessed experience level with computers.
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Courses
1.73
1.511
Usage
62.41
15.492
Correlations
Courses
Usage
Courses
Pearson Correlation
1
.131
Sig. (2-tailed)
.087
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
Covariance
2.282
3.059
N
Usage
Pearson Correlation
.131
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.087
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
41041.512
Covariance
3.059
N
There is no statistically significant correlation between the number of courses participants took and the amount of computer usage they indicated.
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Courses
1.73
1.511
Knowledge
62.63
15.682
Correlations
Courses
Knowledge
Courses
Pearson Correlation
1
.150*
.050
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
Covariance
2.282
3.547
N
Knowledge
Pearson Correlation
.150*
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.050
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
42054.186
Covariance
3.547
N
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
There is a significant positive correlation between the number of courses taken and self-assessed computer knowledge. The more computer courses a participant took, the more generally knowledgeable they were about computers and computer usage.
Above is a chart depicting the frequency distribution of self-assessed obstacles to computer usage and the application of computer-based courses to continued professional development. (See Appendix a for numerical Data)
Appendix a
*insert your summary tables here. Because I have to submit in compatibility mode I can't get the formatting right.
The Staggers Nursing Computer Experience Questionnaire
** Because this is your real data, it would be unethical to give you further information regarding your results sections (I'd end up doing it for you and I know that isn't what you want.) I have everything saved though so if you need a copy of a chart or the spss data just give me a shout and I'll send it along. Good Luck!!
Appendix B
Frequency Distribution Obstacles
N/a
Clerks Type
0
No Typing Class
14
No Computer in work
1
No Computer in Job Desc.
2
no computer at home
16
comp anxiety
52
no need comp for work
9
no comp courses
14
no time in work for comp
6
no need computer home
10
Afraid to lose info
61
No Interest
10
JOHNSO62A2006448
Chart1
0
14
1
2
16
52
9
14
6
10
61
10
Frequency Distribution Obstacles
Sheet1
Frequency Distribution Obstacles
N/a 121
Clerks Type 0
No Typing Class 14
No Computer in work 1
No Computer in Job Desc. 2
no computer at home 16
comp anxiety 52
no need comp for work 9
no comp courses 14
no time in work for comp 6
no need computer home 10
Afraid to lose info 61
No Interest 10
To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now