Verified Document

Nursing That Individuals Employed Within Data Analysis Chapter

860 -2.826

Covariance

.075

-.017

N

Courses

Pearson Correlation

-.040

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.603

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

-2.826

Covariance

-.017

2.282

N

There is no statistically significant correlation between participant gender and the number of courses they took towards increasing their computer proficiency and/or knowledge.

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Courses

1.73

1.511

Experience

3.87

1.463

Correlations

Courses

Experience

Courses

Pearson Correlation

1

.047

Sig. (2-tailed)

.541

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

17.715

Covariance

2.282

.104

N

Experience

Pearson Correlation

.047

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.541

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

17.715

Covariance

.104

2.140

N

There is no statistically significant correlation between the number of courses a participant took and their self-assessed experience level with computers.

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Courses

1.73

1.511

Usage

62.41

15.492

Correlations

Courses

Usage

Courses

Pearson Correlation

1

.131

Sig. (2-tailed)

.087

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

Covariance

2.282

3.059

N

Usage

Pearson Correlation

.131

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.087

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

41041.512

Covariance

3.059

N

There is no statistically significant correlation between the number of courses participants took and the amount of computer usage they indicated.

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Courses

1.73

1.511

Knowledge

62.63

15.682

Correlations

Courses

Knowledge

Courses

Pearson Correlation

1

.150*

(2-tailed)
.050

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

Covariance

2.282

3.547

N

Knowledge

Pearson Correlation

.150*

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.050

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

42054.186

Covariance

3.547

N

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

There is a significant positive correlation between the number of courses taken and self-assessed computer knowledge. The more computer courses a participant took, the more generally knowledgeable they were about computers and computer usage.

Above is a chart depicting the frequency distribution of self-assessed obstacles to computer usage and the application of computer-based courses to continued professional development. (See Appendix a for numerical Data)

Appendix a

*insert your summary tables here. Because I have to submit in compatibility mode I can't get the formatting right.

The Staggers Nursing Computer Experience Questionnaire

** Because this is your real data, it would be unethical to give you further information regarding your results sections (I'd end up doing it for you and I know that isn't what you want.) I have everything saved though so if you need a copy of a chart or the spss data just give me a shout and I'll send it along. Good Luck!!

Appendix B

Frequency Distribution Obstacles

N/a

Clerks Type

0

No Typing Class

14

No Computer in work

1

No Computer in Job Desc.

2

no computer at home

16

comp anxiety

52

no need comp for work

9

no comp courses

14

no time in work for comp

6

no need computer home

10

Afraid to lose info

61

No Interest

10

JOHNSO62A2006448

Chart1

0

14

1

2

16

52

9

14

6

10

61

10

Frequency Distribution Obstacles

Sheet1

Frequency Distribution Obstacles

N/a 121

Clerks Type 0

No Typing Class 14

No Computer in work 1

No Computer in Job Desc. 2

no computer at home 16

comp anxiety 52

no need comp for work 9

no comp courses 14

no time in work for comp 6

no need computer home 10

Afraid to lose info 61

No Interest 10

To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now